For an informed view on connected entertainment in the UK & Ireland, visit Cue Entertainment
Given the contribution that the creative industries make to our
national wealth, plans to maintain the UK as a centre of excellence in creative
innovation might expect to be high on the agenda of the three largest parties.
Yet of the 75,000 words contained in the Conservative, Labour and Lib-Dem
manifestos, barely 1,000 are devoted to the digital economy. If the sector’s
voice is to be heard above the background noise from other lobby groups in the
months to come, it must press its case loudly and clearly, whatever the
composition of the next government.
Most politicians acknowledge the UK’s outstanding record in film
and TV production, video game design and digital media innovation but their
grasp of what is needed to deal with piracy, how high-speed broadband should be
funded and the provision of adequate educational resources for the next
generation of digital media professionals is fuzzy at best.
Companies in the creative sector employ nearly 2 million people
and generate 10% of the UK’s GDP, which makes the lack of detail in all three
manifestos remarkable. Even though the fruits of online digital technology are
happily accepted by consumers, the parties appear to have concluded that there
are few votes to be had in new media.
The 25,000-word Conservative document, for example, identifies
600,000 additional jobs and £18 billion of additional revenues that would
result from having the right broadband infrastructure in place. If implemented,
this would make a significant contribution to resolving the country’s economic
woes. Surprisingly, the Tories provide no further detail on how they plan to
deliver a connected Britain.
In the following paragraph, alongside a commitment to scrap the
50p “phone tax”, the manifesto continues, “If necessary, we will consider using
the part of the licence fee that is supporting the digital switchover to fund
broadband in areas that the market alone will not reach.” And, that is all.
Just these two paragraphs, totalling 105 words, is the sum of the
commitment from the UK’s largest single party to bring digital technology to
the workplace and the home. Not a word on piracy and no encouragement for
creative industries or for businesses in rural areas. Very little either about
the source of the funding needed to enable the UK broadband infrastructure to
match that available elsewhere in the world.
Turning to the smallest of the three parties, the Liberal
Democrats are also reluctant to discuss how high-speed internet and associated
technologies could be developed to benefit the economy. The subject comes up
just once in the 20,000 words of their manifesto, when they claim they would:
“Support public investment in the roll-out of superfast broadband, targeted
first at those areas which are least likely to be provided for by the market.”
Again, no indication of when or how this funding would become available, nor
how the market could be induced to step in and finance those areas not publicly
funded.
In fact, the 25 words reproduced above are the only reference to
broadband in the entire document. Elsewhere they say that, “The creative
industries are one of the fastest growing sectors of the economy,” without any
evidence that they understand the importance of sustaining that growth, though
they do say they have plans for a “Creative Enterprise Fund offering training,
mentoring and small grants or loans to help creative businesses get off the
ground.” The word digital doesn’t appear once in the Liberal Democrat document.
Based on their pre-election promises, a coalition manifesto from
these two parties would contain barely enough words on our digital and creative
industries to fill a postcard, even though 10% of the national income is
derived from these sources.
So does the previous ruling party do any better? The 76-page
Labour Party manifesto devotes nearly three times the combined space of the
other two parties to the subject of broadband Britain. In around 600 words the
party provides a strangely familiar summary of its plans.
This is perhaps not surprising, since the rushed passage through
the House of Commons of the Digital Economy Act was one of the last tasks of
the old régime. Labour probably feels that the digital genie is back in the
bottle for the moment and its manifesto reads like a commitment to do more of
the same. There is a promise to deliver a universal broadband service of “At
least two Megabytes per second” by 2012. The writer obviously had difficulty
telling bits from bytes, since the data rate equates to 16 Megabits per second
(Mbps), which is eight times faster than the 2 Mbps average that most people
receive today. Technology can be so confusing!
State funding of £1 billion would encourage private operators to
bring superfast broadband to 90% of the population, the Labour manifesto
claims. This generous offer, spread over seven years, equates to an annual
spend of about £145 million, a sum of money that is insufficient to dent the
digital divide that separates the UK from continental Europe. Even with this
minimal commitment, finding the public-sector funding in a depression could be
problematic.
The Conservative manifesto acknowledges the major contribution
that the creative sector makes to the British economy. The financial benefits
that would arise from investment in infrastructure are common ground in the
policies of all three parties. There is, however, no sense of urgency in any of
the documents, whether confronting piracy, eliminating broadband “not-spots” or
encouraging the creative industries as wealth generators.
Whether the country is to be governed by a single party or a
coalition of any two out of three, the clamour for lower taxes, better schools,
action on globalisation and many other policies deemed “vote winners” could
overshadow policies on digital media. It is not enough for our rulers to assume
that recent legislation will allow decisions on this key sector to be
postponed. Industry leaders and organisations representing companies in the
digital economy need to start lobbying now to ensure that politicians implement
the sparse policies already in their manifestos and articulate new and better
ways of delivering their broadband promises.
Perhaps even more important than convincing the politicians,
however, is the need to involve the public in the debate on how our digital
infrastructure is to be built and paid for. If the average voter doesn’t care
about issues like the universal broadband commitment, it is unlikely that their
elected representative will do so either.
No comments:
Post a Comment