For an informed view on connected entertainment in the UK & Ireland, visit Cue Entertainment
When he
heard the news about the destruction of the Sony DADC distribution centre, 4
Digital Media MD Tony Tagliente thought it was the end of his business.
“By 4pm
the next day, it was, ‘Problem? What problem?’ and Sony was back in business. I
have nothing but praise for Sony DADC and the way it reacted after the fire,”
he says.
Wienerworld
owner Anthony Broza says, “I thought that Sony did a spectacular job. To have a
whole warehouse erased suddenly as if it never existed with 25 million units of
stock gone; it was horrendous. The overriding thing that comes through is that
Sony is a professional operation, an absolute quality company, and that is the
reason we are part of the family. Yes, of course there will be problems working
out the SKUs, whether they have got the slots, and whether they have got
fork-lift trucks to reach the upper levels but when you look at what they tried
and succeeded in doing, it’s amazing.”
Broza
says that Sony was on the phone the day after the fire to schedule key titles
for manufacture the following day: “We gave them a list of between 12 and 20
titles and they said they would replicate 300 or 500 discs, rather than the
normal minimum order of 1,000 units. They told us, ‘Don’t worry, we want to try
to get you back on track.’ By working with them and alerting them to some of
our problems, they have managed to help us out as much as they could.”
Others
are not so sure that Sony’s offer to replicate a minimum of 300 units will
prove worthwhile. “We have continually asked what the charge will be for 300
units. Is it the 1,000-unit price or the 500-unit price? Once we know that, we
can make a decision on how many we order,” says one client.
This
issue has proved one of the most controversial to confront the customers that
lost most of their inventory in the fire. The replenishment price per unit is a
guideline for Sony, its clients and the insurers, not an offer price for the
acquisition of additional stock. Units lost and not replenished will be
credited at the original invoice price, top-up orders over and above the stock
in the warehouse on Aug. 7 will be charged at the current price. Where fewer
than 300 units were in the warehouse, Sony will remanufacture that number as
the minimum quantity.
While
Sony DADC’s customers are almost unanimous in their approval of the way the
company handled the aftermath of the incident, several company bosses are less
than happy about the progress of what seemed like a straightforward insurance
claim.
Nearly
half the companies that lost stock in the fire are specialist publishers owned
privately with a relatively small annual turnover. Many hoped for a rapid pay
out for destroyed stock to ease cash flow issues and compensate for business
interruption claims that could take a while to settle. It soon became clear,
however, that to sort out the paperwork was no simple task.
One
executive frustrated by the delays says the claims overwhelmed the insurers:
“The loss adjuster sent an email saying, ‘Please, no more calls, we can’t
handle them’. Then they said, ‘We’ll get back to you by the end of the week.’
That’s not good enough, this is our busy period.”
Eureka
Managing Director Ron Benson says he cannot understand the delay given the
comprehensive records held by Sony DADC: “Our claim is 99.9% accurate, we
haven’t put in for any extras or anything. I don’t know how others do it but
Sony knows exactly what it replicated and invoiced, so I don’t think there is a
problem.”
Tagliente
agrees: “Sony has all the documentation for the stock that it held. It can
clarify for the loss adjuster when it came in and when it went out. The proof
is on its system. There will be titles with special packaging — three-DVD and five-DVD box sets — but the invoices are there, they were
paid, it is easy for Sony to double-check. Most people just want to get this
out of their way and get on with their business.”
Part-payment
Sony DADC
VP Sales Siegfried Obermayr says that the company is aware of the pressure on
its clients and it had urged its insurers to agree a part-payment to get cash
into their accounts quickly.
This has
now been made, he says: “We have developed a formula to guarantee that every
case is covered, whether there is no replacement, part replacement or full
replacement of stock and it is intended to be as fair to all sides as
possible.”
The
company set the interim amount at between 40% and 60% of each potential claim,
depending on its complexity and value, Obermayr says. From this figure, it
deducted a notional charge for stock replenishment using an average value per
unit worked out from the claim value in pounds and the number of units lost.
This provided a basis for the part-payment, which the insurers accepted.
He says,
“We know that our customers need help with their cash flow and this formula
allowed us to make that initial payment. Companies have received that
replenishment stock and are trading with it, so it is only right that the
appropriate amount has been held back. No-one has been invoiced for
replenishment stock, which is effectively free of charge. The insurance
principle is there should be no loss and no gain.”
No
claim has been rejected, Obermayr says, but to examine each one in detail is a
lengthy process — all but two
are still are under discussion — and Sony has had one-to-one hearings with clients to examine each
claim, decide if it is too high or too low and make it acceptable to the
insurers.
“Even if
you calculate a half-day of discussion for each, this means two full weeks for
the meetings. Once our own insurer is happy, loss adjusters representing the
police will audit every line once more. We have to make sure that we can stand
behind each claim,” says Obermayr.
As of
late November, the loss adjuster had approved two of the smallest claims of
around £20,000 each and passed it on to the insurers. Obermayr confirms that
the aim is to have the process completed by Christmas, “We do not want it to
run into the New Year,” he says.
Part
of the problem is that there is no consensus on the nature of claims. The
insurance payment relates only to the replacement cost of the assets and does
not include any notional premium for the collectability or rarity of the disc — even though some have tried to claim for
this.
“When one
person told us that a single disc in the warehouse was worth nearly £4,000, we
offered to buy a copy and give it to him. There was also a claim for around
£250 each for 25 units but we had to politely point out that it might not be
accepted by the loss adjustor,” says Obermayr.
Tagliente
believes the process should be “very simple”: “We put in a claim based on what
we and Sony know was in the warehouse at the time of the fire. Sony pays us
that, less any replenishment costs, so we might claim £50,000, for example,
have £30,000 of replication charges and actually receive £20,000.”
Another
issue concerns a lack of information about the progress of claims. Not all the
companies involved are direct customers of Sony DADC and some of the smaller
labels, which have had to file through their third-party sales houses, have
felt excluded from the process and almost overwhelmed by its complexity. As a
result rumour and misinformation created problems that should have been averted
by clearer communication earlier in the process.
Sony
responded to these concerns in mid-November through a daily status report to
all clients in the “Distribution by Sony DADC” (DBD) model. It also encourages
recipients to pass on all relevant information to their clients.
One such
is Metrodome, which lost more than 600,000 units in the fire. Finance Director
Deborah Brown, who has collated claims on behalf of the company’s clients, says
that dealing with the insurance company has proved a complex matter not helped
by communication problems.
“Sony
made sterling efforts to get back on track after the fire, although it probably
could have done more to help us with the insurance claim. At first, the loss
adjuster asked for copies of every invoice but that soon went away. Eventually
we established a single point of contact with the insurers and that really
helped,” she says.
Sony
DADC’s liability does not extend to business continuity insurance or trading
losses incurred as a result of the fire, which individual companies must take
up with their own insurers.
Brown,
who notes that Sony’s is the single largest claim under the Riot (Damages) Act,
is less than hopeful about a pay out. She says: “There is no indication of when
or if that will ever be paid. I am not holding my breath!”
BBC
Worldwide-owned 2entertain has much to gain from a successful claim under the
police compensation scheme but Operations Director Alasdair Ogilvie says that
the last claims under the Riot (Damages) Act 1886 were back in 1981 and the
whole business world has been transformed since then, which further complicates
the situation.
An Aug.
12 statement from the Association of British Insurers (ABI) said that insurers
would cover policyholders for business interruption and lost trade. It
estimated that payments to customers affected by the riots could exceed £200
million.
It said
the police compensation scheme would recompense people, businesses and
organisations for loss and damage incurred as a result of riotous events but
that this only covers the cost of physical loss or damage to property and not
business interruption or trading losses.
“The
priority for insurers is to pay claims to people as quickly as possible and
that is what the insurance industry is doing,” the ABI says, but the complexity
of the claims arising from the Enfield fire could stretch the definition of
“quickly”.
One
company MD says that business interruption losses are a massive problem for
everybody and he would like to see industry pressure on Sony DADC to be an
umbrella organisation in any claim for compensation.
Supply chain delays
While the
insurance claims grind on, peak-season delays have led to concerns about the
robustness of the temporary supply chain. Obermayr acknowledges that there were
picking delays of up to five days in early November but says there was an
unexpected lull in orders from some retailers at the end of October, followed
by a sharp spike in the first week of November.
“In
normal times, this would not be a problem but this year they flooded not only
us but also the whole of the industry with thousands of orders. In an operation
that is not as robust as usual, such extreme peaks present additional hurdles,”
he says.
Benson
says that five days’ delay could be more of a problem for Eureka as the order
cut-off date of Dec. 17 approaches: “The problem is not so much with new
releases but with reorders. We have two very good titles, ‘Silent Running’ and
‘Touch of Evil’, which we shipped out on new release but retailers are having
to wait five or six days for replacement stock. Because of the delay in
picking, I don’t think we are going to reach our targets. It’s not a lack of
manpower, it is the storage room available.”
Obermayr
agrees that the move from the 215,000sq.ft. Enfield warehouse to the
65,000sq.ft unit in Hoddesdon has been a challenge.
“Our
clients are very loyal, they do understand the situation we are in and we get a
lot of support. We now have manufacturing capacity reserved on a weekly basis
for top new release titles of all customers, in anticipation of possible
reorders,” he says.
Tagliente,
however, says the fact that orders had piled up and were not delivered meant
smaller labels were concerned retailers would cancel them: “That was our worry.
It is not as bad as it was but Sony knew that the rush was coming and it
promised us that it would be ready. What can you say except they are doing
their best.”
Preferential treatment
There is
also a predictable suspicion that the bigger distributors are treated better
than the smaller ones, who have been heard to voice complaints.
As Sony’s
largest distribution and manufacturing partner in the UK, 2entertain is adamant
this is not the case. Ogilvie says, “We have insisted that we do not want
anybody to be disadvantaged to our benefit. We are also several days behind in
our picking and Darren Houghton, who is running the plant, says that other
clients face similar delays. We have not asked for any special treatment, just
that we be treated equably, and we recognise that our customers need stock from
all the labels distributed by Sony.”
To ease
the pressure on the Hoddesdon site, 2entertain has agreed with Sony that new
releases will go through Cinram from Oct. 31 and for the time being it will
distribute through both warehouses.
Sony DADC
says it has worked seven days a week since the fire and used weekends to try to
catch up with the backlog. For those clients with manufacturing and
distribution contracts, Sony’s ability to ship campaigns and new releases
direct from the replication plant has eased the problem.
4 Digital
Media Director Sally Wood sums up the general view: “I don’t think any of us
quite realised the vastness of the task. If we had been with a lesser company
than Sony, we would all have been in much deeper trouble. They say it will be
wrapped up by Christmas but we will have to wait and see.”
No comments:
Post a Comment