For an informed view on connected entertainment in the UK & Ireland, visit Cue Entertainment
Just as
the book business has the International Standard Book Number (ISBN) and retail
has the Universal Product Code identification number (UPC) and its associated
barcode, the entertainment industry needs a common code to handle the plethora
of platforms it now serves, according to Entertainment Identifier Registry
(EIDR) head Kip Welch.
Welch is
President of the non-profit EIDR and also VP Business Development and Special
Projects at the Hollywood studio funded technology lab Motion Picture
Laboratories, Inc. (MovieLabs).
He likens
the need for EIDR, which serves as a standard identifier with a 27-digit code
providing a unique identity for every entertainment product in the digital
supply chain, to plumbing.
“Digital
distribution is getting to the point where we can no longer afford the manual
processing that we currently go through,” he told delegates at the Futuresource
Entertainment Summit (FES) in London last week.
“We need
to get ourselves organised; to put the plumbing in place that will allow the
efficiencies of a computerised system to generate new types of revenue. We have
to avoid the mistakes that are slowing the growth of some of the revenue plans
that we all talk about so enthusiastically.”
Almost 40
years on from the first time a store scanned the first product — a packet of
Wrigley’s Juicy Fruit chewing gum — retailers are completely dependent on the
UPC and barcode throughout the supply chain.
“Walk into
a retail store, even a ‘Mom and Pop’ store, and everything has a barcode with
the product code on it. That assists with inventory control and all the systems
that manage those products. They help people to make money and to move money
through the system,” said Welch.
Yet, he
noted, the film and television industry has struggled with several incompatible
numbering systems that make it impossible to track digital assets through the
entertainment pipeline.
EIDR, a
B2B registry of audiovisual assets that extends from titles at the top level
through different versions and encodings to clips and trailers, is designed to
solve that problem.
“Give it a
number and every one of your service providers and vendors can exploit it, look
it up in a centralised service and share all the benefits, which extend to
rights management and enhanced metadata services,” Welch explained.
EIDR,
which is interoperable with other identifier systems, can be extended easily to
cover new and emerging applications.
He
compared the EIDR number to international phone calling: “Dial a number in
Brazil and the phone company there understands that number; you are put through
to the person you want to talk to. Imagine if every time you crossed a national
border, you had to translate the number into a regional telephone numbering
system before you could get through. That is what we do, to some extent, in
digital distribution today.”
EIDR,
however, is not simply about identifying film clips for YouTube, though it
embraces that need, across multiple languages and technical platforms. It meets
the requirements of international television distribution, digital cinema
operators, advertisers and rights owners and it coexists with any identifier
already in use.
Once a
piece of content has an EIDR number, a service provider or supply chain
participant can register as a “look-up user” to ask about a title and its
related metadata in the registry, just as they would search a telephone
directory.
The EIDR
identifier remains with the content, regardless of changes in control or
ownership of the underlying asset. It contains no information about the actual
content, since all the relevant data is stored in a central database. A
sophisticated de-duplication system checks that each allocated EIDR code is
unique, after which the registration and its associated metadata is recorded in
the registry.
The
arrival of the digital rights locker — UltraViolet is one example — provides a
further impetus for the adoption of EIDR. Digital ownership will involve many
different providers delivering the same content to the consumer from different
masters and in differing formats.
For
example, a film may be sold as a Blu-ray disc, along with the rights to
download and stream to the buyer’s connected TV, mobile phone and tablet
device. The retailer, streaming provider and download service all play a role
in delivering the film to the consumer and each party needs to ensure that they
deliver precisely the same content.
“There are
few usage restrictions on EIDR. It is meant to oil the wheels of commerce and
it doesn’t come with a complicated agreement. You can do pretty much anything
you like with it. We want members to help support it and it is not intended to
compete with anyone else in the industry: it is there to enable what you are
doing,” said Welch.
He
acknowledged the need for international agreement to reap the benefits that
EIDR could bring and the fact that it is not something that a small group of
companies in California can impose.
“We need
European support to benefit all of us, so let us know of your interest,
particularly if you have ideas for features that we have not yet thought of,”
he said.
“A lot of
you can use it to help make money and run your business. I’m not here to make
money from you, simply to help all of us do a better and more efficient job in
digital distribution.”
Welch
brings enthusiasm and expertise to the project and he emphasised the
collaborative nature of the organisation. The intention is not to generate a
profit but to cover the set-up and operating overheads associated with the
project. With registration costing between $5,000 (£3,000) and $20,000
(£12,000), rights owners may hold back until they can see the prospects for a
quantifiable return on their outlay.
EIDR must
confront this dilemma. Unless there is a rapid uptake over the next few months,
much of the hard work and investment in digital delivery will go down the
drain.
No comments:
Post a Comment